🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive move to ban social media access for individuals under sixteen is sending ripples worldwide. Officials, child protection groups, and parents are observing with great interest to see if this strategy will become a template for the rest of the world.

Across Europe Trend

Throughout Europe, a rising number of countries are exploring comparable bans.

• Denmark has stated a prohibition on social media for under-15s, with the leader arguing that smartphones and platforms are "stealing our children's innocence". A law is expected to be passed soon.
• Norway is preparing to implement a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to protect the young from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• The Irish government is introducing a digital ID system to verify the age and identity of social media users. The media minister have stated that an Australia-style ban is "an tools in reserve".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has urged the legislature to pass a proposal lifting the access age for using social media to 16.
• In The French government, the leader has floated the idea of a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has endorsed a comparable move, potentially involving an overnight "internet blackout" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The administration in The Netherlands has urged families to block their kids from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has approved a non-binding statement demanding a ban for minors except if a parent decides otherwise is granted. Even though it highlights of the "addictive" quality of these apps, the move does not create binding law.

"An effective age limit is a solid foundation," stated one European lawmaker supporting the resolution.

Britain: A Cautious Stance

Across Britain, the administration has not ruled out a future ban, arguing that "no option is off the table" but maintaining any decision must be "grounded in strong evidence".

Previously, momentum built behind a bill to introduce limits on social media use by minors, but it was ultimately weakened. However, the administration vowed to conduct more studies the matter.

Charities have expressed concerns. A prominent charity established by the family of a young person who died after encountering harmful social media material suggests that a simple age ban might not improve online safety and could lead to a "cliff edge" of risk when young people reach the legal age.

"Australia's ban is a response to the refusal of the tech sector to create platforms and apps that are safe and suitable for young users," commented a leading peer.

The United States: A Decentralized Approach

Stateside, action is mostly occurring at the regional government level due to country-wide stalemate.

• Utah mandates adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and restricts late-night use.
• The state of Florida has enacted a measure barring children under fourteen from accessing social media, though it is subject to constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has approved a law restricting minors to one hour of social media access per day, with any further access needing parental permission.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise introduced measures requiring adult authorization for under-16s to open social media profiles.

Despite bipartisan support and proposals from certain politicians to follow the Australian lead, a nationwide ban is currently seen as improbable.

Global Perspectives

Beyond these regions, further states are similarly taking action.

• Malaysia plans to ban social media for under-16s starting from next year.
• Brazil has raised the access age for one major platform to 16.

However, international bodies take a more nuanced tone. Unicef has warned that blanket prohibitions carry risks and "could backfire". The organization points out that online platforms can be a "critical link" for marginalized children and that bans should not be a "excuse" for platform operators to improve safety.

While this international conversation evolves, the policies of the Australian government and others show that states globally are no longer willing to wait for the industry to make changes on their own.